DEMANDForum.net: Resources for the Prevention of Prostitution and Sex Trafficking Abt Associates

DEMANDForum.net

Resources for the Prevention of Prostitution and Sex Trafficking

Navigation

  • Home
  • About
  • Tactics
    • Auto Seizure
    • Cameras
    • Community Service
    • John School
    • Letters
    • License Suspension
    • Neighborhood Action
    • Public Education
    • Reverse Stings
    • Shaming
    • SOAP Orders
    • Web Stings
  • Locations
  • Browse Sites
  • Additional Resources
  • Contact Us
  • December 18, 2012
  • Michael Shively

Presence of Children at Commercial Sex Transactions

Uncategorized Michael Shively

One of the more disturbing aspects of commercial sex transactions encountered in our review of reverse sting operations is the presence of children.  We found cases in 38 U.S. cities and counties in which infants or young children were present in vehicles or hotel rooms where men had arranged to buy sex.  Recent examples include [...]

Continue Reading →
  • June 15, 2012
  • Michael Shively

Smaller Communities Adopting Big City Tactics on Prostitution

blogposts Michael Shively

Prostitution and sex trafficking are not strictly urban problems, and with the advent of web-based solicitation and wireless technology, are becoming even more decentralized. Police “reverse sting” operations using female decoys to arrest male…

Continue Reading →
  • June 15, 2012
  • Michael Shively

Community Complaints Drive Police Response to Prostitution Demand

blogposts Michael Shively

One of the issues that frequently arises in debates about whether prostitution should be legalized, decriminalized, or remain prohibited is the assertion that it is victimless. The argument against prohibition is built upon the essentially libertarian idea that…

Continue Reading →
Abt Associates   Privacy Policy   Contact Us
Demandforum.net™ was created by Abt Associates with support from the National Institute of Justice.

Disclaimer: Information contained on this website does not represent the views or policies of Abt Associates, the National Institute of Justice, or the U.S. Department of Justice.
Abt Associates